[Перевод] Bulletproof hosting vs Reverse proxy

Bulletproof, offshore, and just normal hosting

Every country has its laws, just like the internet. Plus, there are a lot of gray areas of activity. We are not talking about unimaginable crimes, and even less about criminality, but about activities more likely to run the risk of drowning in a flood of complaints - software distribution, mailing lists, adult content, copyright, etc.

To bypass bans, blocking, and complaints, just and help such bulletproof hosting server or vps. Such hosting, often offshore or located in countries with sufficiently protected rights and creating problems for the site's owner, can only be through the courts. They (hostings) allow different content without much censorship or fear of being removed unexpectedly. There are restrictions here too, of course - on advocacy of violence, narcotics, etc. But they are pre-announced and much more lenient. Hosting providers comply with the law of the country where the data center is located.

If you want a hosting service that ignores complaints, you need to realize a simple thing: there are very few truly bulletproof-resistant hosting services out there. A bit more offshore hosting (they are located in Panama, Malaysia, etc., and therefore quietly ignore the DMCA - such countries simply don't have legislation on such matters). In other areas, they are also loyal... until the complaints start coming in. And there are a lot of ordinary (yes, good, fast, high-quality, responsive support...) hosting providers, which after a couple of complaints will put you "out in the cold". At the same time, such hosting sites are often promoted and advertised as bulletproof hostings. SEO and SMM specialists simply cover all the queries that they can. Plus, it's typically just regular hosting, but it has a section that is almost impossible to find from the home page, but only through a Google search.

Источник: Хабрахабр